| Documents |
 |
| |
In the face of danger from the Govts
or courts there are only two errors one can make: (a) do nothing and (b) defend.
by L Ron Hubbard |
|
|
|
| TRUSTEE |
|
| |
|
January 19, 2002
TRUSTEE'S REPORT - EXHIBITS!
Ron Rakow faxes, Chris Mancuso writes letters, Jean Janu is deposed.. the Slatkinfraud.com All-Stars are out in force, as seen in this massive collection of documents collected by Todd Neilson and referred to in his most recent report. Coming Soon.. Relational Flowcharts created by the Kirkland & Ellis lawfirm. |
|
December 24, 2001
Annotated Top 75 Profiteers List
We've researched the top 75 profiteering investors and compiled them into one page. The investors that compose this list were first announced in the recently released Trustee's report. |
|
December r 19, 2001
TRUSTEE'S REPORT
Trustee Todd Neilson's interim report is also available on the slatkin-investors.com site as a pdf file, but exists here as an html file (warning: 2mb - please be patient when opening). |
|
|
|
 |
|
| Slatkin
|
|
| |
|
March 26, 2002
PLEA AGREEMENT - HTML / PDF |
|
December 26, 2001
Reed's Overt-Witholds
In this transcript of a handwritten 1988 note, Reed makes many startling confessions, all written in 'Scientologese'. The style of note indicates that it is either an 'Overt/Withold' writeup, or a 'Knowledge Report'. The note was first brought to the public's attention in a recent WSJ article.
Did the Church of Scientology see this note? That is unclear at this point, but it follows logic that Reed would be telling his auditor this information.
>> Here's a newsgroup post from a long-time Scientologist that thoroughly analyzes this document. |
|
August 2, 2001
The
Slatkin Chapter 11 Exemption Claim List
Under Chapter 11, Slatkin can claim certain properties
to be exempt from seizure. Here's that list, submitted on July 27, 2001. |
|
June 27, 2001
Reed
Slatkin February 2000 SEC deposition - PART I
Reed
Slatkin February 2000 SEC deposition - PART II
Text Version -
Entire
In his second appearance before the SEC, the casual demeanor
that was a feature of Reed's first day in court is conspicuously absent as the
questioning moves to more specific details about his accounting and money management
practices. Gone, too, are the frequent allusions to his devotion to the Church
of Scientology, perhaps as a result of advice from his embattled securities lawyer,
Gerald Boltz, who also makes a return appearance at this hearing, and at times
seems more sceptical of Reed's answers than the opposing counsel at the SEC table.
Much of the day's testimony is devoted to questions about exactly how the money
moved through the various accounts that Reed controls, as well as the intricacies
of the accounting practice chez Reed at his Kellogg Street office. The SEC also
comes forward with a number of internal documents, including letters, cancelled
cheques and wire transfers. Reed's response is confused, evasive and definitely
not designed to inspire confidence in the veracity of his story. Eventually, the
session closes, after Reed's rueful comment that he feels "pretty beaten up",
with the suggestion that it will resume at a later date. As far as is known, it
never did. |
|
Slatkin apparently created a fake Swiss Bank
"NAA Financial" along with a few non-persons as shown in these
documents, which he delivered to Poitras as 'proof' of his current troubles.
The quality of these 'faxes' is noticeably degraded and that's probably not an
accident.
Reed Slatkin's declaration; his legal response
to Poitras.
Reed Slatkin documents
filed in State of California |
|
|
|
|
| The Slatkin
500 Investor List |
|
| |
|
June 12, 2001
The Slatkin 500
This
list, from 1999, shows over 500 investors whose accounts totalled over 230
million with Slatkin. We will soon have profiles on many/most/all of these investors.
Alphabetized text version
of the same list |
|
|
|
|
| Paul
Junger-Witt / Susan Harris |
|
| |
|
| The
Junger-Harris Motion. These documents get extremely interesting
on page 9 where it is alleged that
Slatkin was looking for a 'charitable contribution' at some
later date. Which charity could Slatkin be thinking of? |
|
|
|
|
| Stuart
Stedman |
|
| |
|
Stuart Stedman, 'manager'
of various Wesley West estate entities, was sent by Slatkin
these extremely informal and undetailed account
statements. The information on these was apparently also
a lie.
Stuart
Stedman Declaration and
text version
Slatkin had a boilerplate 'friendly
agreement' which is how he was able to get around being
an unlicensed investment banker. This particular one was sent
to Stedman. |
|
|
|
|
