 |
documents |
 |
| New Various |
|
Reed Slatkin Declaration (Hitchman) |
dec 2002
|
| In this explosive declaration, filed
in support of bankruptcy trustee Todd Neilson's efforts to seize the
assets of longtime Scientologist Tony Hitchman -- fingered by Slatkin
as his longtime partner in fraud, Slatkin accuses both Hitchman and
Jack Dirmann o fholding him captive in Hitchman's Santa Barbara house
in an effort to force him to sign over to the men his remaining shares
in Earthlink. Slatkin also alleges that Hitchman was complicit in
the Ponzi scheme, and even acted as his "fixer" when officials
from the Church of Scientology got reports on his activities. |
|
|
Jack Dirmann Declaration |
dec 2002
|
| Soon after the incendiary Slatkin statement
was submitted as part of the trustee's ultimately successful effort
to win a Writ of Attachment against Hitchman's assets, a counter declaration
by Jack Dirmann denies any involvement in the activities alleged by
Slatkin.
|
|
|
Jim 'Blue' Crosser Declaration |
dec 2002
|
From former Deloitte and Touche consultant
James Crosser comes this remarkable declaration that purports to demonstrate
that Reed Slatkin's investment club really wasn't a Ponzi scheme at
all.
This declaration first appeared on slatkininfo.com, a website seemingly
dedicated to advocating the defence arguments being made by William
Hutchins, Tony Lonstein, Linda Rosen and Peter Henman Laufer, all
targets of Motions for Writs of Attachment filed by trustee Todd Neilson.
|
|
|
APPLICATION ORDER VACATING HEARING DATE ON TRUSTEE'S MOTION FOR PARTIAL SUMMARY JUDGMENT (including Burstein & Kollitz Declarations and assorted correspondence) |
dec 2002
|
This application was filed by Danning,
Gill, Diamond and Kollitz, attorneys for defendant Peter Henman-Laufer,among
many others facing fraudulent transfer suits. In this motion, DGDK
attorney Richard Burstein claims that Henman-Laufer has been unable
to properly prepare a defence against the motion for summary judgmennt,
due to a lack of opportunity to conduct discovery. Burstein also questions
whether Neilson has clearly demonstrated that Slatkin acted with intent
to defraud.
This file includes, as exhibits, correspondence between lawyers and
declarations from two DGDK attorneys. Highlights include the Hitchman
lawyers demanding that their clients be permitted to depose Slatkin,
to which counsel for the trustee witheringly replies that it is "no
concern of [his] that [their] clients elected to flee the country".
|
|
|
Laing Complaint |
oct 2002
|
| In this complaint, Robert Laing argues
that trustee Todd Neilson should return 72,888 shares of Earthlink
that he says Slatkin had been holding on his behalf.
|
| Trustee |
|
TRUSTEE REPORT - EXHIBITS! |
jan 19 2002
|
| Ron Rakow faxes, Chris Mancuso writes letters, Jean Janu is deposed.. the Slatkinfraud.com All-Stars are out in force, as seen in this massive collection of documents collected by Todd Neilson and referred to in his most recent report. Coming Soon .. Relational Flowcharts created by the Kirkland & Ellis lawfirm. |
|
|
Annotated
Top 75 Net Gainers List |
dec 24 2001
|
| We`ve researched the top
75 net gainers and compiled them into one page. The investors that
compose this list were first announced in the recently released Trustee
report. |
|
|
TRUSTEE REPORT |
dec 19 2001
|
| Trustee Todd Neilson`s interim report is also available on the slatkin-investors.com site as a pdf file, but exists here as an html file (warning: 2mb - please be patient when opening). |
| Slatkin |
|
PLEA AGREEMENT - HTML / PDF |
may 2002
|
|
|
|
Reed`s Overt-Witholds |
dec 26 2001
|
In
this transcript of a handwritten 1988 note, Reed makes many startling confessions,
all written in "Scientologese". The style of note indicates that it
is either an "Overt/Withold" writeup, or a "Knowledge Report".
The note was first brought to the public`s attention in a recent
WSJ article.
Did the Church of Scientology see this note? That is unclear at this point, but it follows logic that Reed would be telling his auditor this information.
Here`s a newsgroup post from a long-time Scientologist that thoroughly analyzes this document. |
|
|
Reed Slatkin February 2000 SEC deposition - PART I
Reed Slatkin February 2000 SEC deposition - PART II
Text Version - Entire |
june 27 2001
|
In his second appearance before the SEC, the casual demeanor that was a feature of Reed`s first day in court is conspicuously absent as the questioning moves to more specific details about his accounting and money management practices. Gone, too, are the frequent allusions to his devotion to the Church of Scientology, perhaps as a result of advice from his embattled securities lawyer, Gerald Boltz, who also makes a return appearance at this hearing, and at times seems more sceptical of Reed`s answers than the opposing counsel at the SEC table.
Much of the day`s testimony is devoted to questions about exactly how the money moved through the various accounts that Reed controls, as well as the intricacies of the accounting practice chez Reed at his Kellogg Street office. The SEC also comes forward with a number of internal documents, including letters, cancelled cheques and wire transfers. Reed`s response is confused, evasive and definitely not designed to inspire confidence in the veracity of his story. Eventually, the session closes, after Reed`s rueful comment that he feels "pretty beaten up", with the suggestion that it will resume at a later date. As far as is known, it never did. |
|
|
The Slatkin 500 Investor List |
june 12 2001
|
This list, from 1999, shows over 500 investors whose accounts totalled over 230 million with Slatkin. We`ve since written profiles on as many investors as we could research.
Alphabetized text version of the same list |
|
|
NAA Financial Faked Documents |
|
| Slatkin apparently created a fake Swiss Bank "NAA Financial" along with a few non-persons as shown in these documents, which he delivered to Poitras as "proof" of his current troubles. The quality of these "faxes" is noticeably degraded and that`s probably not an accident. |
|
|
Slatkin Various |
|
Stuart Stedman, "manager" of various Wesley West estate entities, was sent by Slatkin these extremely informal and undetailed account statements. The information on these was apparently also a lie.
Slatkin had a boilerplate "friendly agreement" which is how he was able to get around being an unlicensed investment banker. This particular one was sent to Stedman.
Reed Slatkin documents filed in State of California |
| Paul Junger-Witt / Susan Harris |
|
The Junger-Harris Motion |
|
| These documents get extremely interesting on page 9 where it is alleged that Slatkin was looking for a "charitable contribution" at some later date. Which charity could Slatkin be thinking of? |
|
|
|